Vantara
In a major development, the Supreme Court of India has closed all complaints and legal cases against Vantara, the wildlife rescue, treatment, and rehabilitation centre operated by the Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, Gujarat. A Special Investigation Team (SIT), appointed by the court, thoroughly investigated the centre and submitted a report confirming that no violations of law or animal welfare standards were found.
Background
Vantara, which means “Star of the Forest,” was established to rescue, rehabilitate, and care for injured, abandoned, or endangered animals. The centre has drawn attention for its scale and for housing a wide variety of species, including elephants, exotic birds, reptiles, and big cats. However, over the last few years, it faced criticism and legal scrutiny. Allegations included concerns about animal sourcing, permits for import and export, compliance with zoo regulations, and the treatment of wildlife in captivity.
To address these concerns, the Supreme Court, in August 2025, formed a four-member SIT. The team was headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice Jasti Chelameswar and included experts from wildlife, customs, and law enforcement backgrounds.

SIT Report and Court Decision
After an in-depth inquiry, the SIT submitted its findings in September 2025. The report stated that Vantara was operating fully within the law. All animal transfers, including imports, were carried out with valid permits under Indian laws and international agreements like CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora)
The report further confirmed that animal care at Vantara met or exceeded national and global standards. The veterinary facilities were well-equipped, mortality rates were within acceptable norms, and animal enclosures followed modern safety and welfare guidelines.Following the submission, the Supreme Court reviewed the report and found no reason to continue legal proceedings. The court officially accepted the SIT’s findings and ordered the closure of all pending cases against Vantara. It also directed that no future complaints based on the same set of allegations should be entertained.

Recommendations and the Future of Vantara
While giving a clean chit, the SIT suggested certain improvements for greater transparency and public engagement. It recommended that parts of the facility, such as the elephant rescue centre, be opened for public viewing where possible, without disturbing the animals. It also encouraged Vantara to collaborate with international conservation bodies and adopt best practices from globally recognized wildlife institutions.
Vantara welcomed the verdict and expressed gratitude to the Supreme Court for a fair and thorough process. In a public statement, it reaffirmed its commitment to wildlife conservation, rescue, and rehabilitation.
The Supreme Court’s ruling is a major endorsement for Vantara and sets a precedent for how large-scale wildlife facilities in India can operate under strict legal and ethical frameworks. With its name now cleared, Vantara is expected to continue its work in conservation and animal welfare with renewed focus and transparency.





